Skip to main content
Occupational Stress Research

Sportspersons: how stressful is the job?

Ranked #121 of 317 Australian occupations for workplace mental health hazards, with a composite stress score of 50/100. The biggest exposure is precision and monotony.

Composite stress score

50/100

National average: 47.4

Rank (most stressful)

#121 of 317

Australian ANZSCO occupations

More stress-exposed than

61.8% of occupations

By composite stress score

Quick answer: Sportspersons are moderately stress-exposed compared with other Australian occupations — ranked #121 of 317 by workplace mental health hazard exposure, with a composite stress score of 50/100 against a national average of 47.4. The biggest drivers are physical environment and pace and demands.

Sportspersons stress profile vs the national average

Each occupation is scored across six categories of workplace mental health hazard, built from 22 stress factors identified in SafeWork Australia's occupational hazards data. Higher scores mean greater exposure.

Emotional demands40.1 vs 37.9 avg
Responsibility burden60.1 vs 60 avg
Pace and demands62.2 vs 56 avg
Lack of control22.9 vs 24.5 avg
Precision and monotony68 vs 67.7 avg
Physical environment46.4 vs 38.2 avg

Scores range 0–100; higher = more stress-inducing. Source: SafeWork Australia Beta Occupational Hazards Dataset.

What drives the score for sportspersons

Compared with the average Australian occupation, sportspersons score furthest above the norm on physical environment (46.4 vs 38.2 average), pace and demands (62.2 vs 56 average) and emotional demands (40.1 vs 37.9 average). The single biggest individual stress factor is level of competition at 86/100 — against an all-occupation average of 52.4.

The occupation scores below the national average for lack of control (22.9 vs 24.5), which moderates the overall ranking.

See how this compares across all 317 Australian occupations, ranked by stress score.

The biggest stress factors for sportspersons

  1. 1Pace and demands

    Level of Competition

    86/100

    All-occupation average: 52.4

  2. 2Responsibility burden

    Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results

    80.2/100

    All-occupation average: 70.4

  3. 3Pace and demands

    Duration of Typical Work Week

    72/100

    All-occupation average: 62.1

  4. 4Pace and demands

    Time Pressure

    71.8/100

    All-occupation average: 71.6

  5. 5Precision and monotony

    Importance of Being Exact or Accurate

    69/100

    All-occupation average: 78.6

All 22 stress factors for sportspersons

The complete scorecard: every stress factor measured for this occupation, grouped into the six categories, with the all-occupation average alongside.

Emotional demands

40.1 vs 37.9 avg
  • Deal With Physically Aggressive People18.2 vs 14
  • Deal With Unpleasant or Angry People49.5 vs 50.4
  • Frequency of Conflict Situations52.5 vs 49.3

Responsibility burden

60.1 vs 60 avg
  • Responsibility for Outcomes and Results59.5 vs 58.5
  • Responsible for Others' Health and Safety63.5 vs 57.3
  • Impact of Decisions on Co-workers or Company Results80.2 vs 70.4
  • Consequence of Error37.8 vs 49
  • Coordinate or Lead Others59.5 vs 64.9

Pace and demands

62.2 vs 56 avg
  • Time Pressure71.8 vs 71.6
  • Duration of Typical Work Week72 vs 62.1
  • Pace Determined by Speed of Equipment14.8 vs 23.1
  • Frequency of Decision Making66.8 vs 70.7
  • Level of Competition86 vs 52.4

Lack of control

22.9 vs 24.5 avg
  • Lack of Autonomy to Make Decisions21.5 vs 23.6
  • Amount of Highly Structured Work24.2 vs 25.3

Precision and monotony

68 vs 67.7 avg
  • Importance of Repeating Same Tasks67 vs 56.9
  • Importance of Being Exact or Accurate69 vs 78.6

Physical environment

46.4 vs 38.2 avg
  • Sounds and Noise Levels Are Distracting or Uncomfortable49.5 vs 52.3
  • Extremely Bright or Inadequate Lighting56.8 vs 24.9
  • Very Hot or Cold Temperatures60.8 vs 32.4
  • Exposed to Disease or Infections5.8 vs 20.2
  • Physical Proximity59.2 vs 61.1

The elevated stress categories for sportspersons map to recognised psychosocial work factors under ISO 45003 and Australian WHS legislation. Learn what each one is and how it can be controlled:

Methodology

Clearhead scored 317 occupations in the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) using SafeWork Australia's Beta Occupational Hazards Dataset. We kept only the 22 hazard variables relating to mental health — such as conflict exposure, decision-making pressure, and time pressure — and deliberately excluded physical safety risks like working at height.

The 22 variables are grouped into six categories: emotional demands, responsibility burden, pace and demands, lack of control, precision and monotony, and physical environment. An occupation's composite score is the equally weighted average of its six category scores. All scores run 0–100, where higher means more stress-inducing.

Two control-related variables are reported by SafeWork with inverted polarity (“freedom to make decisions” and “structured versus unstructured work”). We reverse these and present them as lack of autonomy to make decisions and amount of highly structured work, so that a higher score consistently indicates greater stress exposure.

Hazard exposure describes the average conditions of an occupation, not any individual's experience — everyone has a different tolerance for these challenges, and conditions vary between workplaces.

Frequently asked questions

Sportspersons: how stressful is the job?

Sportspersons rank #121 out of 317 Australian occupations for workplace mental health hazards, with a composite stress score of 50/100 against a national average of 47.4. That makes the occupation more stress-exposed than 61.8% of Australian jobs.

What are the biggest mental health stress factors for sportspersons?

The highest-scoring hazards are level of competition (86/100), impact of decisions on co-workers or company results (80.2/100) and duration of typical work week (72/100). Overall, the occupation scores above the national average in emotional demands, responsibility burden, pace and demands, precision and monotony and physical environment.

Which stress factors are lower for sportspersons?

Sportspersons score below the national average for lack of control (22.9 vs 24.5 average), which partially offsets the higher-scoring hazards.

Where does this data come from?

Scores are derived from SafeWork Australia's Beta Occupational Hazards Dataset. Clearhead filtered the dataset to the 22 mental-health-related hazard variables — excluding physical safety risks — and scored 317 ANZSCO occupations across six categories: emotional demands, responsibility burden, pace and demands, lack of control, precision and monotony, and physical environment.

Beyond the average

This is the average hazard exposure for sportspersons. Your workforce isn't average.

Clearhead's Psychosocial Risk Pulse measures the actual psychosocial risk in your organisation, quarterly — across 18 ISO 45003-aligned work factors.

Clearhead Psychosocial Risk Pulse Tool

Know your industry's risks. Then measure your own.

Population-level data shows where the hazards concentrate — but psychosocial risk legislation requires you to identify and manage the risks in your own workforce. Clearhead's Psychosocial Risk Pulse gives you that evidence, quarterly.

Book a demo